Check out this potted summary of the discussion on Jonny Holland regarding Jon Kollo's recent article:
Jon Kollo writes: "[...] neither brand nor UX will serve as the driving force behind financial success in the coming decades. “User experience” is just a new name for old thinking, and “User experience practitioners” exhibit the same hubris that has long plagued “brand thinking”: the large name-as-mindshare mentality that a company can own a space, a segment, or even a consumer.
Peter Merholz comments: "Wow. This might be among the most irresponsible articles I’ve read all year. Jon sets up UX as a boogeyman, but at no time does he define user experience, and his take on it runs totally contrary to how I, and all the other UX practitioners I know, practice it. [...]"
Jared M. Spool comments: "Jon has put forward a very distorted notion of user experience. If you look at the companies at the forefront of great experience design, none of them take the approach that they are designing something “for a person to experience” as Jon asserts. Neither Virgin America, Disney, Cirque du Soliel, Apple, nor Starbucks is about designing exact experiences.
Cennydd Bowles tweets: "Do read @jkolko's provocative article: http://is.gd/58TwG I both strongly approve of and vehemently disagree with what he says."